Back to Architecture Firm
Architecture FirmPro · $5~30 min per proposal, 3 hours one-time setup

Generate Client Proposals That Protect Your Scope and Close Faster

Writing proposals is where small firms lose the most untracked time. A principal spends 4–8 hours on a proposal for a project that may or may not close, the scope is often written from memory under time pressure, and the fee is guessed based on "what feels right." The result: proposals that take too long, quote too low, and leave holes that turn into scope creep later. This guide builds a full proposal system — a qualifying intake form that filters out bad fits early, a fee calculator that uses your actual firm data, a scope-proof proposal generator, and a follow-up sequence that actually closes deals. This pays back the cost of the guide on your very next proposal.

Intermediate~30 min per proposal, 3 hours one-time setupChatGPT or Claude · Your fee data · Past proposals

What You’ll Get

  • A client qualifying intake form that filters out bad-fit projects in under 10 minutes
  • A fee calculator template matched to your firm’s real rates and typical hours
  • A scope-proof proposal generator that outputs a client-ready draft in 30 minutes
  • A follow-up email sequence that closes proposals faster
  • A "good proposal vs. pass" decision framework

Step-by-Step Guide

1

Build a client qualifying intake form

Most firms say yes to every inquiry. The highest-leverage change is saying no earlier to projects that won’t close or won’t be profitable.

Prompt
I want to build a client intake form that surfaces whether a prospective project is worth pursuing before I spend hours on a proposal.

My firm:
- Firm size: [NUMBER]
- Project types I want to pursue: [LIST]
- Project types I want to avoid: [LIST]
- Minimum fee threshold (below which the project isn't worth pursuing): $[AMOUNT]
- Typical client profile I work well with: [DESCRIBE]
- Client red flags I've learned to spot: [LIST]

Please create:
1. **A 12–15 question intake form** that covers: project type, budget (construction budget AND design fee expectations), site/property status, permitting status, expected timeline, prior architect relationship (why they left), decision-maker identification, financing, and key success criteria
2. **A scoring rubric** that flags the intake as: strong fit / worth a meeting / polite pass
3. **A polite decline template** for inquiries that don't pass scoring — preserves the relationship for future referral
4. **A "request for more info" template** for intakes that are incomplete
5. **A red-flag detection list** — specific answers that should trigger a caution flag (unrealistic budget, rushed timeline, 3rd architect on the project, unclear decision-maker)
2

Build a fee calculator that uses your actual data

Most proposals quote fees from memory. Build a calculator grounded in your real firm data so you stop undercharging.

Prompt
I want to build a fee calculator for my firm that uses my actual data, not industry averages.

My firm's historical data:
- Average hours per phase for my most common project type: [SD hours / DD hours / CD hours / CA hours]
- Average hours by role for that type: [principal hours / PA hours / designer hours / drafter hours]
- My standard billing rates: [Principal $X, PA $X, Designer $X, Drafter $X]
- My target profit margin: [%]
- My overhead multiplier (if known): [MULTIPLIER]

Please create:
1. **A fee calculation worksheet** — inputs: project type, size (SF), complexity (simple/medium/complex), phases included; outputs: estimated hours by phase and role, total hours, base fee, fee with target margin, fee as % of construction cost for benchmarking
2. **A complexity multiplier** — how I should scale hours for a "complex" version of my typical project (historic, complex site, demanding client, tight schedule)
3. **A minimum fee floor** — the smallest total fee below which the project isn't worth my time regardless of "hours math"
4. **A "walk away" fee** — the fee I would quote if I didn't actually want the project but didn't want to say no outright
5. **Three pricing scenarios** — for a typical project of my common type: conservative (pad hours 20%), standard, aggressive (minimum margin). When to use each.

Pro guide

Unlock the full playbook.

This guide has 6 steps — prompts, frameworks, and templates built for your industry. Unlock for $5.

How Pro works

one-time, unlock this guide forever on this browser. Secure checkout via Stripe.